Marginalia

Knowledge

What can I know — and how do I know that I know it?

✶ In the Atlas

Western epistemology runs like a relay: Plato distrusts the senses; René Descartes doubts everything to find certainty; John Locke and David Hume ground knowledge in experience and end in scepticism; Immanuel Kant argues the mind shapes what it knows.

The Indian tradition asks a different question. In the Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad the highest knowledge (vidyā) is not information about objects but the realization of the knower itself — and that knowledge liberates. Follow the whole relay in What Can We Know?.

Thinkers & Authors

44
UĀ
c. 800–700 BCE · Indian

Uddālaka Āruṇi

उद्दालक आरुणि

Upanishadic teacher who instructed his son Śvetaketu with salt in water and the seed of a banyan, ending each lesson — “tat tvam asi”, that thou art.

Yājñavalkya
c. 800–700 BCE · Indian

Yājñavalkya

याज्ञवल्क्य

The boldest sage of the Upanishads, who taught that the Self (ātman) is the unseen seer, describable only as “neti neti” — not this, not this.

GV
c. 700 BCE · Indian

Gārgī Vācaknavī

गार्गी वाचक्नवी

The woman philosopher who challenged Yājñavalkya at King Janaka’s court with questions about what the universe is “woven on” — pressing him until he warned that her head would fall off, then returning with two questions “like arrows”. One of the earliest named women philosophers in history.

M
c. 700 BCE · Indian

Maitreyī

मैत्रेयी

Yājñavalkya’s wife, “a discourser on Brahman”, who asked whether all the wealth in the world could make her immortal — and, refusing her share of his property, received instead his teaching that all love is love of the Self.

Sophocles
c. 497–406 BCE · Ancient Greek

Sophocles

Σοφοκλῆς

The Athenian tragedian of Oedipus and Antigone — the poet of human blindness, unbending will and the collision of laws — whom Aristotle took as the model of tragedy.

Socrates
470–399 BCE · Ancient Greek

Socrates

Σωκράτης

The Athenian gadfly who wrote nothing, claimed to know nothing, questioned everyone — and was put to death for it, becoming philosophy’s martyr.

P
c. 450–350 BCE · Indian

Pāṇini

पाणिनि

The grammarian of ancient Gandhāra whose Aṣṭādhyāyī — 4,000 rules generating the whole of Sanskrit — is the most rigorous description of any language before modern linguistics, and one of the great intellectual achievements of antiquity.

Plato
c. 428–348 BCE · Ancient Greek

Plato

Πλάτων

Socrates’ student and Aristotle’s teacher, author of the dialogues, founder of the Academy, and the philosopher of the Forms — of whom Whitehead said all Western philosophy is a series of footnotes.

Aristotle
384–322 BCE · Ancient Greek

Aristotle

Ἀριστοτέλης

Plato’s greatest student and tutor of Alexander the Great, who founded logic, systematized biology, ethics and politics, and brought the Forms down to earth.

K
c. 375–283 BCE · Indian

Kauṭilya (Cāṇakya)

कौटिल्य · चाणक्य · Viṣṇugupta

The Brahmin strategist who, by tradition, made Candragupta Maurya emperor and wrote the Arthaśāstra — the ancient world’s most comprehensive treatise on statecraft, economics, law, diplomacy, espionage and war. India’s Machiavelli, two thousand years before Machiavelli.

Z
c. 369–286 BCE · Chinese

Zhuangzi

莊子 Zhuāngzǐ (Zhuang Zhou)

The wittiest of Chinese philosophers — the butterfly dreamer, sceptic, and teller of tales — who mocked fixed perspectives and taught the free and easy wandering of a mind attuned to the Dao.

J
c. 250 BCE · Indian

Jaimini

जैमिनि

The sage credited with the Mīmāṃsā Sūtras, the founding text of Vedic hermeneutics — and, in legend, a disciple of Vyāsa who heard the Mahābhārata from his master.

K
c. 200 BCE · Indian

Kaṇāda

कणाद

The founder of Vaiśeṣika and traditional author of the Vaiśeṣika Sūtras — the sage remembered as India’s first atomist, who taught that everything perceptible is built from eternal, indivisible particles.

GA
c. 150 · Indian

Gautama Akṣapāda

अक्षपाद गौतम

The founder of the Nyāya school and traditional author of the Nyāya Sūtras — the first systematic Indian treatise on logic, knowledge and debate. Legend gave him eyes in his feet.

Nāgārjuna
c. 150 – c. 250 · Indian

Nāgārjuna

नागार्जुन

Founder of the Madhyamaka (“Middle Way”) school of Buddhism, who argued that all things are empty (śūnya) of independent existence — including emptiness itself.

P
c. 150 · Indian

Patañjali

पतञ्जलि

The compiler of the Yoga Sūtras — 196 terse aphorisms that define yoga as the stilling of the mind — honoured by tradition also as the grammarian of the Great Commentary on Pāṇini and as an incarnation of the serpent Ādiśeṣa.

K
c. 200 – c. 700 · Indian

Kundakunda

कुन्दकुन्द

The most revered Digambara Jain teacher — author of the Samayasāra, which distinguishes the absolute standpoint, from which the soul is pure consciousness untouched by karma, from the conventional standpoint, from which it is bound.

A
c. 310 – c. 390 · Indian

Asaṅga

असङ्ग

Co-founder of Yogācāra Buddhism, who after twelve years of fruitless meditation found the future Buddha Maitreya in a wounded dog — and wrote the great maps of the bodhisattva path and of consciousness.

V
c. 316 – c. 396 · Indian

Vasubandhu

वसुबन्धु

The 4th–5th century Buddhist philosopher who wrote the definitive summary of Abhidharma — and then, converted by his brother Asaṅga, became co-founder of Yogācāra, arguing that the world we experience is “representation only”.

B
c. 370 – c. 450 · Indian

Buddhaghosa

बुद्धघोष

The 5th-century Indian monk who went to Sri Lanka and translated and systematised the Theravāda commentaries — author of the Visuddhimagga, “The Path of Purification”, the definitive map of Theravāda doctrine and meditation.

B
c. 450 – c. 510 · Indian

Bhartṛhari

भर्तृहरि

The 5th-century philosopher of language who taught that ultimate reality is the Word (śabda-brahman), that meaning flashes forth as a whole (sphoṭa), and that all knowledge is shot through with language — and, by tradition, the poet of the Three Centuries on love, worldly wisdom and renunciation.

D
c. 480 – c. 540 · Indian

Dignāga

दिग्नाग

The founder of Buddhist logic and epistemology — only perception and inference give knowledge, perception grasps bare particulars, concepts are constructions, and words mean by excluding (apoha). He revolutionised the logic of every Indian school.

D
c. 600 – c. 670 · Indian

Dharmakīrti

धर्मकीर्ति

The 7th-century Buddhist logician who perfected Dignāga’s epistemology — proving momentariness, refuting a creator God and the Veda’s authority, and defining knowledge by its reliability — the most formidable philosophical opponent the Hindu schools ever faced.

KB
c. 620 – c. 690 · Indian

Kumārila Bhaṭṭa

कुमारिल भट्ट

The 7th-century Mīmāṃsā philosopher who turned Vedic ritual hermeneutics into a full philosophy — defending the authorless Veda, the self-validity of knowledge and a realist world against the Buddhists, and arguing that no creator God is needed.

Ādi Śaṅkara
c. 700 – c. 750 · Indian

Ādi Śaṅkara

आदि शङ्कराचार्य

The great systematizer of Advaita (non-dual) Vedānta — Brahman alone is real, the world is māyā, and the individual self is none other than Brahman.

U
c. 975 – c. 1050 · Indian

Udayana

उदयन

The great Nyāya philosopher of Mithilā who gave Indian philosophy its classic proofs of God’s existence, defended the reality of the self against the Buddhists, and closed the classical age of Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika.

Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā)
980 – 1037 · Islamic & Arabic

Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā)

ابن سينا · Abū ʿAlī al-Ḥusayn ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Sīnā

Persian polymath — physician, metaphysician, logician — whose Canon of Medicine was taught in Europe for 500 years and whose distinction between essence and existence reshaped philosophy in Islam and the Latin West.

Al-Ghazālī
1058 – 1111 · Islamic & Arabic

Al-Ghazālī

أبو حامد الغزالي · Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad al-Ghazālī

Theologian, jurist and mystic whose Incoherence of the Philosophers attacked Avicenna’s Aristotelianism, anticipated Hume on causation, and whose spiritual autobiography records a crisis of doubt.

H
1088 – 1172 · Indian

Hemacandra

हेमचन्द्र

The Jain polymath of 12th-century Gujarat — grammarian, poet, logician, lexicographer, historian and royal adviser — called “the omniscient of the Kali age”, who persuaded a king to ban animal slaughter.

Averroes (Ibn Rushd)
1126 – 1198 · Islamic & Arabic

Averroes (Ibn Rushd)

ابن رشد · Abū al-Walīd Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Rushd

Andalusian judge and philosopher — “the Commentator” on Aristotle — who defended philosophy against al-Ghazālī and argued that reason and revelation cannot contradict each other.

J
1275 – 1296 · Indian

Jñāneśvar

ज्ञानेश्वर · Sant Dnyaneshwar

The 13th-century Marathi saint-poet who, at about twenty, wrote the Jñāneśvarī — a 9,000-verse commentary on the Bhagavad Gītā in Marathi that founded Marathi literature and the Vārkarī devotional tradition — and entered living samādhi at twenty-one.

GU
c. 1300 – c. 1360 · Indian

Gaṅgeśa Upādhyāya

गङ्गेश उपाध्याय

The 14th-century logician of Mithilā who founded Navya-Nyāya, the “New Logic”, in his Tattvacintāmaṇi — a technical language of such precision that it became the common idiom of Indian scholarship for five centuries.

Michel de Montaigne
1533 – 1592 · French

Michel de Montaigne

The inventor of the essay, who made himself the subject of his book — sceptical, curious, tolerant, candid — and asked, “Que sais-je?” — What do I know?

Miguel de Cervantes
1547 – 1616 · Spanish

Miguel de Cervantes

Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

Soldier, captive, tax collector and the father of the modern novel — whose Don Quixote made a deluded old knight and his earthy squire the most famous pair in literature.

René Descartes
1596 – 1650 · French

René Descartes

Renatus Cartesius

The father of modern philosophy, who doubted everything that could be doubted and found one thing that could not — that he himself was thinking.

John Milton
1608 – 1674 · British & Irish

John Milton

English poet, polemicist and revolutionary whose Paradise Lost — written blind, after the defeat of his cause — retells the Fall of Man to “justify the ways of God to men”, and gave literature its most magnificent rebel, Satan.

John Locke
1632 – 1704 · British & Irish

John Locke

Father of British empiricism and of liberalism — the mind begins as a blank slate, and government rests on the consent of the governed.

David Hume
1711 – 1776 · British & Irish

David Hume

The great Scottish sceptic who showed that causation, the self, and induction cannot be justified by reason — and that reason is, and ought only to be, the slave of the passions.

Immanuel Kant
1724 – 1804 · German-language

Immanuel Kant

The philosopher who tried to end the war between rationalism and empiricism by asking what the mind itself contributes to experience — the “Copernican revolution” in philosophy.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
1749 – 1832 · German-language

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Germany’s greatest writer — poet, novelist, dramatist, scientist and statesman — whose Faust is the modern myth of the striving soul, and whose life was itself treated as a work of art.

RM
1879 – 1950 · Indian

Ramana Maharshi

ரமண மகரிஷி · Venkataraman Iyer

The silent sage of Arunachala (1879–1950), who at sixteen experienced his own death and the deathless Self, and taught one practice above all — self-inquiry, “Who am I?” — the simplest and most direct path of Advaita.

SR
1888 – 1975 · Indian

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan

సర్వేపల్లి రాధాకృష్ణన్

The philosopher-statesman who presented Indian philosophy to the West as a living tradition — Oxford’s Spalding Professor of Eastern Religions, author of Indian Philosophy, and India’s second President. Teachers’ Day is his birthday.

Ludwig Wittgenstein
1889 – 1951 · Austrian & Central European

Ludwig Wittgenstein

The Viennese-Cambridge philosopher who twice transformed philosophy — first by mapping the limits of what language can say (Tractatus), then by showing that meaning is use in the countless “language games” of ordinary life (Philosophical Investigations).

JK
1895 – 1986 · Indian

Jiddu Krishnamurti

జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి

The philosopher raised by the Theosophists to be a “World Teacher”, who renounced the role in 1929 — “truth is a pathless land” — and spent sixty years teaching that freedom comes only from seeing the movement of one’s own mind, without authority, method or guru.

Works

24
c. 800–200 BCE · Indian

The Upaniṣads

उपनिषद् · upaniṣad — "sitting down near"

The philosophical dialogues that close the Vedas (c. 800–200 BCE) — forest teachings in which kings, priests, women and a boy at Death’s door ask what the Self is, what Brahman is, and how to be free. The source of Vedānta, and of almost every later Indian idea about the self.

Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad
c. 700 BCE · Indian

Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad

बृहदारण्यक उपनिषद्

The “Great Forest” Upanishad, oldest and longest, home of Yājñavalkya’s debates, the teaching to Maitreyī, and “neti neti”.

Chāndogya Upaniṣad
c. 650 BCE · Indian

Chāndogya Upaniṣad

छान्दोग्य उपनिषद्

One of the oldest Upanishads, famed for Uddālaka’s teaching to Śvetaketu — tat tvam asi — and Satyakāma’s honest answer about his birth.

c. 550 BCE · Indian

Taittirīya Upaniṣad

तैत्तिरीयोपनिषद्

The Upaniṣad of the five sheaths and the graduation address — it defines Brahman as “truth, knowledge, infinity”, peels away the layers of the self from food to bliss, measures the bliss of Brahman, and tells departing students “Treat your mother as a god.”

Kaṭha Upaniṣad
c. 500 BCE · Indian

Kaṭha Upaniṣad

कठ उपनिषद्

The story of the boy Naciketas, who goes to the house of Death and asks what happens after death — receiving the teaching of the immortal Self.

c. 500 BCE · Indian

Kena Upaniṣad

केनोपनिषद्

The “By whom?” Upaniṣad — by whom is the mind sent forth, the breath set going, speech uttered? Its answer is the paradox that Brahman is known only by those who know they do not know it — and a story of the gods humbled by a blade of grass.

Oedipus the King
c. 429 BCE · Ancient Greek

Oedipus the King

Οἰδίπους Τύραννος · Oedipus Tyrannus · Oedipus Rex

Sophocles’ tragedy of the king who hunts down the murderer of his predecessor — and discovers that he himself killed his father and married his mother. Aristotle’s model of the perfect tragedy.

c. 400 BCE · Indian

Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad

मुण्डकोपनिषद्

The Upaniṣad of the “shaven head” — it distinguishes the “lower knowledge” of the Vedas and sciences from the “higher knowledge” of the imperishable, compares ritual to leaky boats, gives the image of two birds on one tree, and India its national motto, “Truth alone triumphs”.

c. 400–200 BCE · Indian

Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad

श्वेताश्वतरोपनिषद्

The most theistic of the principal Upaniṣads — it identifies Brahman with Rudra-Śiva, a personal Lord to be loved, blends Vedānta with early Sāṃkhya and Yoga, and first uses the words māyā and bhakti in their later senses.

c. 395 BCE · Ancient Greek

The Apology of Socrates

Ἀπολογία Σωκράτους

Plato’s account of Socrates’ defence speech at his trial in 399 BCE — a manifesto for the philosophical life.

c. 375 BCE · Ancient Greek

The Republic

Πολιτεία

Plato’s great dialogue on justice — in the soul and in the city — containing the philosopher-kings, the Allegory of the Cave, and the banishment of the poets.

c. 200 BCE – c. 200 · Indian

The Nāṭyaśāstra

नाट्यशास्त्र · Nāṭyaśāstra — "Treatise on Theatre"

Bharata’s encyclopaedia of the performing arts — theatre, dance, music, costume, architecture, and the theory of rasa — called the “fifth Veda”, composed for all classes of people. The foundation of Indian aesthetics.

c. 200 BCE – c. 200 · Indian

The Nyāya Sūtras

न्यायसूत्र · Nyāyasūtra

The root text of Indian logic — about 530 aphorisms on the means of valid knowledge, the structure of argument, the art of debate and its dishonest tricks, and the self, the world and liberation.

c. 200 BCE – c. 300 · Indian

The Pañcatantra

पञ्चतन्त्र · Pañcatantra — "Five Treatises"

The ancient Indian book of animal fables written to teach princes the art of practical wisdom (nīti) — the jackals Karaṭaka and Damanaka, the monkey and the crocodile, the lion and the hare — translated into more languages than almost any book except the Bible.

c. 100 BCE – c. 200 · Indian

Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad

माण्डूक्योपनिषद्

The shortest Upaniṣad — twelve verses on the syllable Oṃ and the four states of consciousness, waking, dreaming, deep sleep and the “fourth” (turīya), the pure Self. Said to be enough, by itself, for liberation.

c. 100 BCE – c. 200 · Indian

The Questions of King Milinda

मिलिन्दपञ्ह · Milindapañha

A dialogue between the Indo-Greek king Menander and the Buddhist monk Nāgasena — the chariot argument for no-self, the flame of rebirth, and a Greek king’s sharp questions answered with Indian wit. A meeting of Greece and India in the 2nd century BCE.

c. 150 – c. 250 · Indian

Mūlamadhyamakakārikā

मूलमध्यमककारिका · "Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way"

Nāgārjuna’s 450 verses in 27 chapters — the founding text of Madhyamaka, which examines causation, motion, the self, time and nirvāṇa, and shows that nothing has intrinsic existence; everything is empty because everything is dependent.

c. 150 – c. 450 · Indian

Tattvārtha Sūtra

तत्त्वार्थसूत्र · Tattvārthasūtra

Umāsvāti’s “Manual of the Meaning of the Reals” — the first Sanskrit summary of Jain philosophy, 350 sūtras accepted by both Digambaras and Śvetāmbaras, covering knowledge, souls, the universe, karma, ethics and liberation.

c. 325 – c. 425 · Indian

The Yoga Sūtras

योगसूत्र · Yogasūtra

Patañjali’s 196 aphorisms — the root text of classical Yoga — which define yoga as the stilling of the mind’s fluctuations, diagnose the afflictions that cause suffering, set out the eight limbs of practice, and end in the “isolation” of pure consciousness.

Don Quixote
1605 – 1615 · Spanish

Don Quixote

El ingenioso hidalgo don Quijote de la Mancha

Cervantes’s comic masterpiece about a country gentleman driven mad by chivalric romances, who sets out as a knight-errant with his squire Sancho Panza — often called the first modern novel and the greatest ever written.

Critique of Pure Reason
1781 · German-language

Critique of Pure Reason

Kritik der reinen Vernunft

Kant’s masterwork, asking what reason can know without experience — and answering that it can know the forms of all possible experience, but nothing beyond.

1783 · German-language

Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics

Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik

Kant’s short, clearer restatement of the first Critique, where he credits Hume with waking him from his dogmatic slumber.

Faust
1808 – 1832 · German-language

Faust

Faust. Eine Tragödie

Goethe’s two-part dramatic poem of the scholar who wagers his soul with Mephistopheles that no moment of pleasure will ever satisfy him — the defining myth of modern restless striving.

1886 · German-language

Beyond Good and Evil

Jenseits von Gut und Böse

Nietzsche’s “prelude to a philosophy of the future” — an attack on the prejudices of philosophers, from Plato to Kant, and a sketch of the free spirit.

Ideas

12
c. 500 BCE · Indian

Anekāntavāda

अनेकान्तवाद · anekāntavāda — "the doctrine of non-one-sidedness"

The Jain doctrine that reality is many-sided — that every thing has infinite aspects and every statement captures only one, so that truth requires holding many viewpoints together. Expressed in the parable of the blind men and the elephant and formalised in the sevenfold logic of syādvāda.

c. 450 BCE · Indian

Pratītyasamutpāda (Dependent Origination)

प्रतीत्यसमुत्पाद · pratītyasamutpāda (Pāli paṭiccasamuppāda)

The Buddha’s central insight — “when this exists, that comes to be; when this ceases, that ceases.” Nothing exists independently; everything arises from conditions. Applied to suffering, it becomes the twelve-linked chain from ignorance to death.

380 BCE · Ancient Greek

The Forms

εἶδος · ἰδέα

Plato’s eternal, perfect, unchanging realities — Beauty itself, Justice itself, the Good — of which the things we see are imperfect copies.

c. 100 BCE · Indian

Śūnyatā (Emptiness)

शून्यता · śūnyatā

Emptiness — the Mahāyāna teaching that all things lack intrinsic, independent existence (svabhāva), because they arise in dependence on causes, parts and concepts. Not nothingness, but the openness that makes change and freedom possible.

c. 0 · Indian

Rasa

रस · rasa — "juice", "flavour", "essence"

The Indian theory of aesthetic experience — the “flavour” or “relish” that art evokes in the audience. Bharata named eight rasas; Abhinavagupta added peace and explained rasa as the self tasting its own consciousness through universalised emotion.

700 · Indian

Māyā

माया

The power of appearance — in Advaita, the cosmic illusion by which the one Brahman appears as a world of many things.

1637 · French

Cogito, ergo sum

Je pense, donc je suis

I think, therefore I am — the one certainty Descartes found after doubting everything else.

1739 · British & Irish

The Problem of Induction

No non-circular argument shows that the future will resemble the past — yet all science and daily life depend on it.

1748 · British & Irish

Hume's Fork

Every meaningful claim is either a relation of ideas (certain but empty) or a matter of fact (informative but uncertain) — metaphysics is neither.

1781 · German-language

Synthetic a priori

synthetische Urteile a priori

Judgments that are informative about the world yet knowable independently of experience. Kant’s master question was how they are possible.

1781 · German-language

The Thing-in-Itself

Ding an sich

Reality as it is independently of how it appears to us — for Kant, thinkable but never knowable.

1787 · German-language

The Copernican Revolution

kopernikanische Wende

Kant’s reversal — instead of the mind conforming to objects, objects must conform to the mind’s forms of knowing.

Schools & Movements

18
800 BCE – 1900 · Indian

Vedānta

वेदान्त

“The end of the Veda” — the schools that interpret the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gītā and Brahma Sūtras to understand Brahman, the Self, and liberation.

c. 600 BCE – c. 1400 · Indian

Cārvāka (Lokāyata)

चार्वाक · लोकायत

India’s materialist school — only perception is knowledge, only matter is real, there is no soul, no rebirth, no karma and no God, and the purpose of life is pleasure. Its own books are lost; we know it through the furious refutations of every other school.

c. 600 BCE – c. 2000 · Indian

Jainism

जैन धर्म · Jaina dharma — the way of the Jinas ("conquerors")

The ancient Indian tradition of the Jinas — radical non-violence toward every living being, a soul weighed down by karmic matter, the “many-sidedness” of truth, and liberation by self-discipline without a creator God. Small in numbers, immense in influence.

500 BCE – 2000 · Indian

Buddhism

बौद्ध धर्म · Buddha-dharma — the teaching of the Awakened One

The tradition founded by the Buddha — suffering, impermanence, no-self, and the path to nirvāṇa — later dividing into Theravāda, Mahāyāna (Madhyamaka, Yogācāra) and Vajrayāna.

387 BCE – 529 · Ancient Greek

Platonism

The tradition descending from Plato — eternal Forms, an immortal soul, and a reality higher than the senses — from the Academy through Neoplatonism to Christian theology.

c. 300 BCE – c. 1800 · Indian

Mīmāṃsā

मीमांसा · mīmāṃsā — "inquiry", "investigation"

The school of Vedic interpretation — the hermeneutics of ritual and duty that treated the Veda as eternal and authorless, defended the self-validity of knowledge, denied a creator God, and developed theories of language, meaning and law that shaped all of Hindu jurisprudence.

250 BCE – 2000 · Indian

Theravāda and the Abhidharma

थेरवाद · Theravāda — "the teaching of the elders"

The oldest surviving school of Buddhism — the Pāli Canon, the arhat ideal, and the Abhidhamma analysis of experience into momentary ultimate realities — living today in Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos and Cambodia.

c. 200 BCE – c. 1900 · Indian

Nyāya

न्याय · nyāya — "method", "rule", "logic"

India’s great school of logic and epistemology — the theory of valid knowledge (pramāṇa), the five-membered syllogism, the catalogue of fallacies, realist metaphysics, and the most famous arguments for God in Indian philosophy. Its later form, Navya-Nyāya, became the technical language of all Indian scholarship.

c. 200 BCE – c. 1700 · Indian

Vaiśeṣika

वैशेषिक · vaiśeṣika — "of particularity"

India’s school of natural philosophy and atomism — reality analysed into six (later seven) categories, the world built from eternal, indivisible atoms of earth, water, fire and air, combined by an unseen moral force. Merged with Nyāya, it gave Indian realism its map of what exists.

c. 200 BCE – c. 1800 · Indian

Yoga (darśana)

योग · yoga — "yoking", "union", "discipline"

The classical school of Patañjali — Sāṃkhya’s dualism of consciousness and nature, plus a God and a practical method — defining yoga as “the stilling of the fluctuations of the mind” and mapping the eight limbs from ethics to absorption.

150 – 2000 · Indian

Madhyamaka

मध्यमक · Madhyamaka — "the Middle Way"

Nāgārjuna’s school of emptiness — nothing has intrinsic existence (svabhāva), all things are empty because they arise in dependence, and even emptiness is empty. Its dialectic dismantles every view, and it became the summit of Tibetan Buddhist philosophy.

300 – 1200 · Indian

Yogācāra

योगाचार · Yogācāra — "the practice of yoga"; also Vijñānavāda, "the doctrine of consciousness"

The “mind-only” school of Mahāyāna Buddhism, founded by Asaṅga and Vasubandhu — the world we experience is a construction of consciousness, carried by a “storehouse” of karmic seeds; awakening is the transformation of the basis of consciousness itself.

700 – 2000 · Indian

Advaita Vedānta

अद्वैत वेदान्त

Non-dualist Vedānta — Brahman alone is real, the world is appearance (māyā), and the self is identical with Brahman.

1050 – 1500 · Patristic & Medieval

Scholasticism

The method and philosophy of the medieval universities — rigorous disputation, the reconciliation of faith and reason, and the absorption of Aristotle into Christian, Jewish and Islamic thought.

1637 – 1720

Continental Rationalism

The seventeenth-century conviction that reason alone, unaided by the senses, can reach certain knowledge of the deepest truths.

1680 – 1800

The Enlightenment

The eighteenth-century movement that put reason, science, tolerance and individual liberty at the centre of human affairs — “Sapere aude!”

1690 – 1776 · British & Irish

British Empiricism

The view that all knowledge comes from experience — the mind begins as a blank slate on which the senses write.

1900 – 1970 · German-language

Phenomenology

Husserl’s method of describing experience exactly as it appears — “to the things themselves!” — which Heidegger and Sartre turned toward existence.

Debates

2

Characters

1

Great Scenes

5

Great Questions

3

Lines to Remember

36 quotations
The unexamined life is not worth living.

ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ

— Socrates , The Apology of Socrates · Apology 38a
Context & when to use it

At his trial, refusing to go into exile and keep quiet — a life without philosophical examination is no life for a human being.

The founding sentence of philosophy. For reflection, self-knowledge, intellectual courage.

I am wiser than this man; for neither of us really knows anything fine and good, but this man thinks he knows something when he does not, whereas I, as I do not know anything, do not think I do either.
— Socrates , The Apology of Socrates · Apology 21d
Context & when to use it

After questioning a politician reputed to be wise.

The authentic source of “I know that I know nothing” — use against overconfidence and the Dunning–Kruger effect.

⚠ The slogan “I know that I know nothing” is a later compression; Socrates’ actual claim is more modest.

They see only their own shadows, or the shadows of one another, which the fire throws on the opposite wall of the cave.
— Plato , The Republic · Republic VII, 515a (Jowett)
Context & when to use it

For illusion, propaganda, echo chambers, mistaking appearance for reality.

Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy… cities will never have rest from their evils.
— Socrates , The Republic · Republic V, 473d (Jowett)
Context & when to use it

For the relation of wisdom and power; technocracy debates.

It is owing to their wonder that men both now begin and at first began to philosophize.
— Aristotle · Metaphysics I.2, 982b12
Context & when to use it

Plato said the same in the Theaetetus (155d) — philosophy begins in wonder.

For curiosity as the root of philosophy and science.

What then is time? If no one asks me, I know; if I wish to explain it to one who asks, I know not.

Quid est ergo tempus? Si nemo ex me quaerat, scio; si quaerenti explicare velim, nescio.

— Augustine of Hippo · Confessions XI.14
Context & when to use it

For any concept we use easily but cannot define.

There are no facts, only interpretations.
— Friedrich Nietzsche · Nachlass, 1886–87 (notebook 7[60])
Context & when to use it

Against positivism — “facts is precisely what there is not, only interpretations.”

For perspectivism; careful — Nietzsche is not saying anything goes.

⚠ From an unpublished notebook, not a book he finished.

Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.
— Søren Kierkegaard · Journals, 1843 (JJ:167)
Context & when to use it

Reflection always comes after; we must act before we understand.

For decisions under uncertainty, regret, the limits of hindsight.

From the unreal lead me to the real; from darkness lead me to light; from death lead me to immortality.

असतो मा सद्गमय। तमसो मा ज्योतिर्गमय। मृत्योर्मा अमृतं गमय॥

— , Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad · Bṛhadāraṇyaka 1.3.28
Context & when to use it

The pavamāna mantra, chanted for purification.

For the spiritual journey from ignorance to knowledge; a prayer that fits any tradition.

This Self is not this, not this. It is ungraspable, for it is not grasped; indestructible, for it is not destroyed; unattached, for it does not attach itself.

स एष नेति नेत्यात्मा

— Yājñavalkya , Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad · Bṛhadāraṇyaka 4.5.15
Context & when to use it

For apophatic thought — what cannot be described, only negated (compare negative theology).

You cannot see the seer of seeing; you cannot hear the hearer of hearing; you cannot think the thinker of thinking; you cannot know the knower of knowing.
— Yājñavalkya , Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad · Bṛhadāraṇyaka 3.4.2
Context & when to use it

For the subject that cannot be an object — compare Kant’s transcendental “I” and Wittgenstein’s eye that does not see itself.

Arise! Awake! Approach the great ones and learn. Sharp as the edge of a razor, hard to cross — the path is difficult, so the sages say.

उत्तिष्ठत जाग्रत प्राप्य वरान्निबोधत। क्षुरस्य धारा निशिता दुरत्यया दुर्गं पथस्तत्कवयो वदन्ति॥

— , Kaṭha Upaniṣad · Kaṭha 1.3.14
Context & when to use it

Vivekananda’s favourite verse.

For awakening, effort, the difficulty of the spiritual or intellectual path.

I freely admit that it was the remembrance of David Hume which, many years ago, first interrupted my dogmatic slumber.
— Immanuel Kant , Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics · Preface
Context & when to use it

Kant’s tribute to the sceptic who forced him to rethink everything.

When someone’s comfortable certainties have just been shaken — or to credit an opponent who made you think.

Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are blind.

Gedanken ohne Inhalt sind leer, Anschauungen ohne Begriffe sind blind.

— Immanuel Kant , Critique of Pure Reason · A51/B75
Context & when to use it

The whole Kantian synthesis in eight words — rationalism without senses is empty; empiricism without concepts is blind.

The perfect one-liner for “theory vs. experience” arguments.

I think, therefore I am.

Je pense, donc je suis.

— René Descartes · Discourse on Method, Part IV (1637); Latin "cogito, ergo sum" in Principles I.7 (1644)
Context & when to use it

The foundational certainty of modern philosophy; for self-knowledge and doubt.

If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things.
— René Descartes · Principles of Philosophy I.1 (paraphrased translation)
Context & when to use it

For methodical doubt and intellectual honesty.

Commit it then to the flames, for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.
— David Hume · Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding §12
Context & when to use it

The famous end of the Enquiry — any book that contains neither mathematical reasoning nor experimental reasoning about facts.

Against empty metaphysics, jargon, unfalsifiable claims.

A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence.
— David Hume · Enquiry §10, "Of Miracles"
Context & when to use it

For rational belief, scepticism about extraordinary claims.

I dine, I play a game of back-gammon, I converse, and am merry with my friends; and when after three or four hours’ amusement, I would return to these speculations, they appear so cold, and strained, and ridiculous.
— David Hume · Treatise 1.4.7
Context & when to use it

Hume’s cure for sceptical despair — nature and company.

When philosophy has gone too far; for common sense and conviviality.

Let us then suppose the mind to be, as we say, white paper, void of all characters, without any ideas. How comes it to be furnished?… To this I answer, in one word, from experience.
— John Locke · Essay Concerning Human Understanding II.1.2
Context & when to use it

For empiricism and nurture over nature.

The owl of Minerva spreads its wings only with the falling of the dusk.

Die Eule der Minerva beginnt erst mit der einbrechenden Dämmerung ihren Flug.

— Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel · Philosophy of Right, Preface (1820)
Context & when to use it

Philosophy understands an age only when it is ending.

For hindsight; why theory lags behind history.

The true is the whole.

Das Wahre ist das Ganze.

— Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel , Phenomenology of Spirit · Preface §20
Context & when to use it

For holism against piecemeal truths.

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; genius hits a target no one else can see.
— Arthur Schopenhauer , The World as Will and Representation · Vol. II, ch. 31 (loosely translated)
Context & when to use it

For genius and vision.

The limits of my language mean the limits of my world.

Die Grenzen meiner Sprache bedeuten die Grenzen meiner Welt.

— Ludwig Wittgenstein · Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 5.6
Context & when to use it

The Tractatus on the subject as the limit of the world.

For how vocabulary shapes thought, and for learning languages.

Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.

Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen.

— Ludwig Wittgenstein · Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 7
Context & when to use it

The last proposition of the book — after throwing away the ladder.

For the limits of argument, the ineffable, or ending a pointless dispute.

What is your aim in philosophy? — To show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle.
— Ludwig Wittgenstein · Philosophical Investigations §309
Context & when to use it

Philosophy as therapy for confusions created by language.

For dissolving rather than solving a problem.

If you tried to doubt everything you would not get as far as doubting anything. The game of doubting itself presupposes certainty.
— Ludwig Wittgenstein · On Certainty §115
Context & when to use it

Against radical scepticism.

Brevity is the sister of talent.

Краткость — сестра таланта.

— Anton Chekhov · Letter to Alexander Chekhov, 11 April 1889
Context & when to use it

For editing, writing, and speaking.

What is here may be found elsewhere; what is not here is nowhere.

yad ihāsti tad anyatra yan nehāsti na tat kvacit

— , The Mahābhārata · Mahābhārata 1.56.33
Context & when to use it

For a work that contains a world.

The syllogism he had learnt — “Caius is a man, men are mortal, therefore Caius is mortal” — had always seemed to him correct as applied to Caius, but certainly not as applied to himself.
— Leo Tolstoy , The Death of Ivan Ilyich · ch. 6
Context & when to use it

Dying, Ivan Ilyich discovers that logic does not make death believable.

For the gap between knowing and realizing; Heidegger’s “one dies” versus “I die”.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
— Hamlet , Hamlet · 1.5
Context & when to use it

After seeing the Ghost, to his rationalist university friend.

Against narrow rationalism or scientism; for the limits of any system — Kant’s noumena in one line.

⚠ “Your philosophy” means philosophy in general, not Horatio’s personal philosophy.

How terrible it is to know, when knowledge brings no profit to the knower.
— Tiresias , Oedipus the King · Oedipus the King 316–317
Context & when to use it

For unwelcome truths and the burden of knowledge.

Consider your origin — you were not made to live like brutes, but to follow virtue and knowledge.

fatti non foste a viver come bruti, ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza

— Ulysses , The Divine Comedy · Inferno 26.118–120
Context & when to use it

Ulysses urges his old companions on their last voyage beyond the known world — which ends in shipwreck.

For the thirst for knowledge — and its risks. Primo Levi recited it in Auschwitz.

Look, your worship, those things over there aren’t giants, they’re windmills, and what seem to be their arms are the sails.
— Sancho Panza , Don Quixote · Part I, ch. 8
Context & when to use it

For the realist’s reply to the idealist — and for tilting at windmills.

Grey, dear friend, is all theory, and green the golden tree of life.

Grau, teurer Freund, ist alle Theorie, und grün des Lebens goldner Baum.

— Mephistopheles , Faust · Faust I, 2038–2039
Context & when to use it

For life over abstraction — with a wink about who says it.

⚠ Spoken by the devil, mocking a student — not Goethe’s sincere verdict on theory.

The play’s the thing wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king.
— Hamlet , Hamlet · 2.2
Context & when to use it

For art as a mirror that reveals guilt.

Sententiae

phrases in the original
Ancient Greek
γνῶθι σεαυτόν

Gnōthi seauton

“Know thyself.”
gnōthiknow!seautonyourself

Origin. Inscribed in the forecourt of the Temple of Apollo at Delphi; Socrates made it the charge of his philosophy (Plato, Phaedrus 229e, Charmides 164d). — Socrates

⚠ Originally probably meant “know your place — you are mortal, not a god”, not introspection.

For self-knowledge, humility, the starting point of wisdom.

Ancient Greek
ἀπορία

Aporia

“Impasse, puzzlement — “no way through”.”
a-withoutporospassage, way

Origin. The state Socrates leaves his partners in at the end of the early dialogues — they realize they don’t know what they thought they knew. — Socrates

For honest bewilderment as the beginning of thought.

Ancient Greek
ἓν οἶδα ὅτι οὐδὲν οἶδα

Hen oida hoti ouden oida

“One thing I know, that I know nothing.”
henone thingoidaI knowhotithatoudennothing

Origin. A later Greek slogan summarizing Socrates in Plato’s Apology (21d). — Socrates

⚠ Socrates never says this in Plato. His claim is subtler — he does not think he knows what he does not know.

For intellectual humility — and for correcting someone who quotes it as Socrates’ exact words.

Latin

Cogito, ergo sum

“I think, therefore I am.”
cogitoI thinkergothereforesumI am

Origin. Descartes, first in French (“je pense, donc je suis”, Discourse on Method, 1637), then in Latin in the Principles of Philosophy (1644). — René Descartes

⚠ The Meditations never use this formula — there it is “ego sum, ego existo” (I am, I exist). Augustine had argued “si fallor, sum”.

For the one certainty that survives doubt; the birth of modern subjectivity.

Latin

Tabula rasa

“A scraped (blank) tablet.”
tabulawriting tabletrasascraped clean

Origin. Roman wax tablets were scraped smooth to be reused. The image of the mind as a blank tablet goes back to Aristotle (De Anima III.4); Locke’s “white paper” made it the emblem of empiricism. — John Locke

⚠ Locke himself does not use the Latin phrase in the Essay; he says “white paper”.

For nurture versus nature, fresh starts, empiricism.

Latin

Sub specie aeternitatis

“Under the aspect of eternity.”
subunderspecieaspect, formaeternitatisof eternity

Origin. Spinoza, Ethics V — the highest knowledge sees things not in time but as following necessarily from God’s eternal nature. — Baruch Spinoza

For seeing one’s troubles from the widest possible perspective.

Latin

Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas

“Plato is a friend, but truth is a greater friend.”
amicusfriendsedbutmagismoreveritastruth

Origin. A medieval Latin compression of Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics I.6 — “though both are dear, piety requires us to honour truth above our friends.” — Aristotle

For disagreeing with a teacher or ally out of honesty.

German

Das Ding an sich

“The thing in itself.”
Dingthingan sichin itself

Origin. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason — reality as it is independent of how it appears to us. — Immanuel Kant

For what lies beyond appearances and models.

Sanskrit
नेति नेति

Neti neti

“Not this, not this.”
nanotitithus, this

Origin. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 2.3.6 and Yājñavalkya’s teachings (4.2.4, 4.5.15). — Yājñavalkya, Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad

For the via negativa — reaching the absolute by negating every description.

Sanskrit
सत्यमेव जयते

Satyam eva jayate

“Truth alone triumphs.”
satyamtruthevaalone, indeedjayateconquers

Origin. Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad 3.1.6 — the national motto of India, inscribed beneath the Lion Capital emblem.

For integrity and truth over expediency.

Sanskrit
असतो मा सद्गमय

Asato mā sad gamaya

“Lead me from the unreal to the real.”

Origin. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1.3.28 — continued “from darkness to light, from death to immortality.” — Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad

As a prayer for truth and understanding.

Sanskrit
उत्तिष्ठत जाग्रत

Uttiṣṭhata jāgrata

“Arise! Awake!”

Origin. Kaṭha Upaniṣad 1.3.14 — continued “approach the great and learn”. Vivekananda’s call to India. — Kaṭha Upaniṣad

For awakening, effort, self-improvement.

Explore Next

related by shared connections