Marginalia

The Nāṭyaśāstra

नाट्यशास्त्र · Nāṭyaśāstra — "Treatise on Theatre"

Theatre is a fifth Veda for everyone — and its purpose is to give the audience rasa.

Written c. 200 BCE – c. 200Form treatise By Bharata Muni Read 2 min · 538 words
⇋ Compare ✶ In the Atlas
Contents · 4 sections · 2 min

Key Ideas

Theatre (nāṭya) was created by Brahmā as a fifth Veda accessible to all classes.

Rasa arises from the combination of determinants, consequents and transitory states.

Eight rasas, eight stable emotions, thirty-three transitory states.

Four kinds of acting — gesture, speech, costume and inner feeling (sāttvika).

Theatre shows all the world — dharma, play, wealth, peace, laughter, war, love and killing.

The Nāṭyaśāstra (“Treatise on Theatre”), attributed to the sage Bharata, is an encyclopaedic Sanskrit treatise on the performing arts, compiled probably between the second century BCE and the second century CE. In some six thousand verses it covers almost everything about theatre: its divine origin, the construction of playhouses, rituals before performance, the kinds of plays, plot structure, dramatic genres, poetic metre and figures of speech, language and dialects, acting technique, gesture (including detailed descriptions of hand gestures, eye movements and gaits), dance, music and musical instruments, costume, make-up, and the training of actors. Its sixth and seventh chapters contain the theory of Rasa, the foundation of all later Indian aesthetics. Indian tradition calls it the “fifth Veda”.

The origin of theatre

The first chapter tells how theatre began. In the Treta age, when people had become subject to pleasure and pain, desire and greed, the gods asked Brahmā for an entertainment that could be seen as well as heard, and that would be open to all, since the Vedas could not be heard by Śūdras. Brahmā created the Nāṭyaveda, the fifth Veda, taking recitation from the Ṛg Veda, song from the Sāma Veda, acting from the Yajur Veda and emotion (rasa) from the Atharva Veda. He gave it to the sage Bharata, who performed the first play with his hundred sons, at the festival of Indra’s banner: the victory of the gods over the demons. The demons, offended, disrupted it with magic; Indra beat them off with the banner-staff; and the gods built a theatre to protect performances.

Brahmā then explained theatre’s purpose: it represents “the whole of the three worlds” — “sometimes dharma, sometimes play, sometimes wealth, sometimes peace, sometimes laughter, sometimes war, sometimes love, sometimes killing… It will give comfort to the suffering, rest to the weary, courage to the timid, pleasure to the lovers, wisdom to the ignorant… There is no knowledge, no craft, no learning, no art, no yoga, no action that is not found in theatre.”

Rasa

The heart of the treatise is the theory of rasa (chapter 6): “rasa arises from the combination of determinants, consequents and transitory states” (vibhāvānubhāvavyabhicārisaṃyogād rasaniṣpattiḥ). Bharata lists eight rasas — erotic, comic, pathetic, furious, heroic, terrible, odious and marvellous — with their stable emotions and colours (the erotic is dark blue, the comic white, the pathetic grey, the furious red…). Chapter 7 describes the stable emotions, the thirty-three transitory states and the eight involuntary physical responses (sāttvika bhāvas): paralysis, sweating, horripilation, change of voice, trembling, change of colour, tears and fainting.

Acting and dance

Bharata distinguishes four kinds of abhinaya (“bringing forward”, acting): āṅgika, through the body — gestures of the head, eyes, eyebrows, hands, feet; vācika, through speech and song; āhārya, through costume and make-up; and sāttvika, through the inner emotional states shown involuntarily. His catalogue of hand gestures (hastas) and body movements is the basis of all classical Indian dance — Bharatanāṭyam, Kathakali, Odissi, Kathak.

Significance

The Nāṭyaśāstra is one of the oldest and most comprehensive treatises on theatre in the world, comparable with Aristotle’s Poetics but far more practical. Through the commentaries — especially Abhinavagupta‘s Abhinavabhāratī — its theory of rasa became the dominant aesthetic of Indian civilisation.

The Commentary Tree

mūla → bhāṣya → ṭīkā

In India a root text is rarely read alone. Terse sūtras or verses (mūla) are unfolded by a commentary (bhāṣya), which is explained by sub-commentaries (ṭīkā, vārttika) — each generation arguing with the last. This is how The Nāṭyaśāstra has been read.

  1. The Nāṭyaśāstra Bharata Muni · c. 200 BCE – c. 200
  2. Commentaries of Bhaṭṭa Lollaṭa various · 8th–10th century

    Lost, known only through Abhinavagupta’s summaries — the great debate over where rasa lives.

  3. Abhinavabhāratī Abhinavagupta · c. 1000

    The only surviving complete commentary, and the classic theory of rasa.

Curiosities

did you know?
  • The Nāṭyaśāstra describes 108 karaṇas (dance movements), sculpted on the gopuras of the Chidambaram and Thanjavur temples.
  • It specifies the ideal theatre building — a medium-sized rectangular hall about 32 metres long — so that every spectator can see the actors’ facial expressions.

Questions to Argue About

debate club →
  1. Can one theory explain theatre, dance and music together?

Explore Next

related by shared connections
Idea · 1637 · French

Cogito, ergo sum

Je pense, donc je suis

I think, therefore I am — the one certainty Descartes found after doubting everything else.

School · c. 850 – c. 1200 · Indian

Kashmir Śaivism

त्रिक · Trika; प्रत्यभिज्ञा · Pratyabhijñā — "recognition"

The non-dual Śaiva philosophy of medieval Kashmir — reality is the free, self-aware consciousness of Śiva, who playfully contracts himself into the many selves and the world, and liberation is the recognition that you are Śiva. The world is not illusion but God’s self-expression.

School · 700 – 2000 · Indian

Advaita Vedānta

अद्वैत वेदान्त

Non-dualist Vedānta — Brahman alone is real, the world is appearance (māyā), and the self is identical with Brahman.

JK
Thinker · 1895 – 1986 · Indian

Jiddu Krishnamurti

జిడ్డు కృష్ణమూర్తి

The philosopher raised by the Theosophists to be a “World Teacher”, who renounced the role in 1929 — “truth is a pathless land” — and spent sixty years teaching that freedom comes only from seeing the movement of one’s own mind, without authority, method or guru.

Work · c. 500 BCE · Indian

Kena Upaniṣad

केनोपनिषद्

The “By whom?” Upaniṣad — by whom is the mind sent forth, the breath set going, speech uttered? Its answer is the paradox that Brahman is known only by those who know they do not know it — and a story of the gods humbled by a blade of grass.

Work · c. 400 BCE · Indian

Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad

मुण्डकोपनिषद्

The Upaniṣad of the “shaven head” — it distinguishes the “lower knowledge” of the Vedas and sciences from the “higher knowledge” of the imperishable, compares ritual to leaky boats, gives the image of two birds on one tree, and India its national motto, “Truth alone triumphs”.