Marginalia

Continental Rationalism

The seventeenth-century conviction that reason alone, unaided by the senses, can reach certain knowledge of the deepest truths.

Period 1637 – 1720
⇋ Compare ✶ In the Atlas

Core Theses

Some knowledge is innate or a priori — not derived from experience.

Reason, modelled on geometry, can deduce substantive truths about God, mind and world.

The senses are confused; the intellect is clear.

The universe is rationally intelligible through and through (the principle of sufficient reason).

The rationalists — René Descartes, Baruch Spinoza and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz — wanted philosophy to be as certain as geometry. Spinoza even wrote his Ethics in the form of Euclid, with definitions, axioms, propositions and proofs.

They disagreed wildly about the result: two substances (Descartes), one substance that is God-or-Nature (Spinoza), infinitely many windowless monads (Leibniz). That spectacle of rival certainties is part of what Immanuel Kant meant when he called pre-critical metaphysics a “battlefield of endless controversies.”

See the great quarrel: Rationalism vs. Empiricism.

Members

3

Explore Next

related by shared connections