Marginalia

Rationalism vs. Empiricism

Where does knowledge come from — reason or the senses?

Period 1637 – 1781
✶ In the Atlas
René Descartes · Baruch Spinoza · Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

Rationalism

Reason alone can know necessary truths. There are innate ideas. The senses are confused; the intellect is clear.

John Locke · David Hume

Empiricism

All ideas come from experience. The mind begins blank. Reason without experience tells us nothing about the world.

The Exchange

who answered whom
  1. René Descartes
    René Descartes

    The senses deceive. Only what I perceive clearly and distinctly by reason is certain — and the ideas of God and self are innate.

  2. John Locke
    John Locke

    There are no innate ideas. Children and idiots have no idea of God. The mind is white paper; experience writes on it.

  3. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz

    Nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the senses — except the intellect itself. The mind is veined marble, not blank paper.

  4. David Hume
    David Hume

    Then follow experience to the end — and you find no impression of necessary connection, substance, or self. Causation is habit; induction is unjustified.

  5. Immanuel Kant
    Immanuel Kant

    Both are half right. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. All knowledge begins with experience, but it does not all arise out of experience.

The debate shaped the whole curriculum of modern philosophy, though the labels are partly a later invention: Kant himself drew the two camps sharply, and nineteenth-century historians made the “three rationalists” and “three empiricists” (adding Berkeley) a textbook scheme.

Who won? Immanuel Kant claimed a synthesis. The logical positivists of the 1920s sided with empiricism. Noam Chomsky’s arguments for innate grammar revived rationalism. Cognitive science still argues about “nativism”.

Explore Next

related by shared connections