Marginalia

What Can We Know?

What can we know, and how do we know it?

✶ In the Atlas
  1. 1
    Parmenides
    c. 515–450 BCE · Ancient Greek

    Parmenides

    Reason against the senses — thinking shows that change, which we see everywhere, is impossible.

    Read the full argument →
  2. 2
    Plato
    c. 428–348 BCE · Ancient Greek

    Plato

    The senses give opinion about shadows; true knowledge is of the eternal Forms, reached by reason — the Cave.

    Read the full argument →
  3. 3
    Aristotle
    384–322 BCE · Ancient Greek

    Aristotle

    Knowledge begins in perception; form is in things, abstracted by the mind.

    Read the full argument →
  4. 4
    René Descartes
    1596 – 1650 · French

    René Descartes

    Doubt everything; the cogito survives; rebuild knowledge on clear and distinct ideas guaranteed by God.

    Read the full argument →
  5. 5
    John Locke
    1632 – 1704 · British & Irish

    John Locke

    No innate ideas — all knowledge comes from experience.

    Read the full argument →
  6. 6
    David Hume
    1711 – 1776 · British & Irish

    David Hume

    Follow experience all the way — causation is habit, induction unjustified, the self a bundle.

    Read the full argument →
  7. 7
    Immanuel Kant
    1724 – 1804 · German-language

    Immanuel Kant

    The mind supplies the forms of all experience. We know appearances with necessity — but never things in themselves.

    Read the full argument →
  8. 8
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel
    1770 – 1831 · German-language

    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

    Drop the thing-in-itself. Reason is not trapped behind appearances — truth is the whole, the self-knowing of Spirit.

    Read the full argument →
  9. 9
    Friedrich Nietzsche
    1844 – 1900 · German-language

    Friedrich Nietzsche

    There are no facts, only interpretations. The will to truth itself must be questioned.

    Read the full argument →

Meanwhile in India, a parallel relay: the Upanishads seek the knowledge that liberates; the Buddhists deny a knower behind knowing; the Nyāya logicians build a theory of valid means of knowledge (pramāṇa) — perception, inference, comparison, testimony; Nāgārjuna turns the pramāṇas against themselves; and Ādi Śaṅkara makes knowledge (jñāna) the only path to liberation.

Explore Next

related by shared connections