Marginalia

Being vs. Becoming

Is change real?

Period 500–380 BCE
✶ In the Atlas
Parmenides

Being

What-is, is; what-is-not cannot be thought. Change would require something to come from nothing. Reality is one, eternal, unmoving.

Heraclitus

Becoming

Everything flows; you cannot step into the same river twice. Strife and change are the life of the cosmos, governed by the logos.

The Exchange

who answered whom
  1. Heraclitus
    Heraclitus

    The world is an ever-living fire, kindling and going out in measures. The road up and the road down are one.

  2. Parmenides
    Parmenides

    Mortals who know nothing wander two-headed, for whom to be and not to be are the same and not the same. Reason shows that what-is is ungenerated and imperishable.

  3. Plato
    Plato

    Both are right about different realms — the Forms are Parmenidean being; the sensible world is Heraclitean becoming.

  4. Aristotle
    Aristotle

    Change is real — it is the actualization of a potential. Things become what they are capable of becoming.

  5. Friedrich Nietzsche
    Friedrich Nietzsche

    Heraclitus will remain eternally right that being is an empty fiction. The “apparent” world is the only one.

The quarrel runs on: process philosophy (Whitehead, Bergson) versus substance metaphysics; the “block universe” of relativity versus the flowing time of experience. In India, the Buddhist doctrine of momentariness against the Vedāntic changeless Brahman is a strikingly parallel debate.

Sententiae

phrases in the original
Ancient Greek
πάντα ῥεῖ

Panta rhei

“Everything flows.”
pantaall thingsrheiflow

Origin. The summary of Heraclitus’ doctrine — but the phrase itself appears first in later writers (Simplicius); it is not among his fragments. — Heraclitus

⚠ A slogan about Heraclitus, not by him.

For impermanence and change.

Explore Next

related by shared connections