Marginalia
Parmenides
Sergio Spolti · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons

Parmenides

/ par-MEN-i-deez /
Παρμενίδης

The stern pre-Socratic of Elea who argued that only what-is can be thought, that nothing comes from nothing, and that change and plurality are illusions.

Lived c. 515–450 BCEFrom Elea, Magna Graecia (southern Italy) philosopher · poet
⇋ Compare ✶ In the Atlas
Inherited from
Parmenides
Parmenides
Passed on to

Parmenides in Four Ideas

the essentials

What-is, is

There are only two roads of inquiry — “it is” and “it is not”. The second is unthinkable, since you cannot think or say what is not.

Thinking and being are the same

“For the same thing is for thinking and for being” (fragment B3) — perhaps the first statement of the unity of mind and reality.

Nothing comes from nothing

What-is cannot have come into being, for it would have had to come from what-is-not. Hence being is ungenerated and imperishable.

Change is illusion

Motion, birth, death and plurality belong to the “way of opinion” of mortals; reason shows reality to be one, whole, unmoving, like a well-rounded sphere.

Parmenides wrote philosophy as an epic poem. A young man is carried by chariot through the gates of Night and Day to a goddess who teaches him two ways: the Way of Truth and the Way of Opinion. Only fragments survive — around 160 lines — but they set the agenda for the whole of Greek metaphysics.

His argument is ruthless. If you can only think what is, then “nothing” cannot be thought. Then nothing can come from nothing, nothing can pass away into nothing, there can be no empty space, and therefore no motion. Reality is one, eternal and changeless. The world of change we see is a mortal illusion.

Who answered

Every later Greek philosopher had to answer Parmenides. The atomists (Leucippus, Democritus) accepted that being cannot come from non-being, but split being into countless unchangeable atoms moving through the void. Plato honoured him as “venerable and awesome” and gave him a dialogue; his Forms are Parmenidean beings — eternal, changeless — set above a Heraclitean world of flux. The Being vs. Becoming still runs through physics and metaphysics.

The parallel with Advaita Vedānta is striking: there too reality (brahman) is one, changeless being, and the world of multiplicity is appearance. Whether there was any historical contact is unknown.

Curiosities

did you know?
  • He wrote his philosophy as an epic poem in hexameters.
  • Plato called him ‘venerable and awesome’.

Questions to Argue About

debate club →
  1. Is change an illusion?
  2. Can you think about nothing?
Parmenides · Zeno of Elea, reported in Aristotle, Physics VI.9

Achilles and the Tortoise

Zeno’s defence of Parmenides — if space is infinitely divisible, swift Achilles can never overtake the slow tortoise.

  1. The tortoise starts ahead of Achilles.
  2. To overtake it, Achilles must first reach the point where the tortoise was.
  3. By then the tortoise has moved a little further; Achilles must reach that point, and so on, infinitely.
  4. No one can complete infinitely many tasks in a finite time.

∴ Achilles never overtakes the tortoise — motion is impossible, as Parmenides taught.

2 objections
  • Aristotle: Distance is only potentially infinitely divided; time is divided in the same way, so infinitely many potential intervals can be crossed in finite time.
  • Modern mathematics: An infinite series can have a finite sum (1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + … = 1); the paradox trades on the assumption that it cannot.

In Their Own Words

1 quotations
For it is the same thing to think and to be.

τὸ γὰρ αὐτὸ νοεῖν ἐστίν τε καὶ εἶναι

— Parmenides · Fragment B3
Context & when to use it

For idealism, the unity of thought and reality, the limits of what can be thought.

Sententiae

phrases in the original
Latin

Ex nihilo nihil fit

“Nothing comes from nothing.”
exout ofnihilonothingnihilnothingfitcomes to be

Origin. The principle goes back to Parmenides (c. 500 BCE), who argued that what-is cannot come from what-is-not. Lucretius put it in Latin verse — “nil posse creari de nilo”, nothing can be created out of nothing (De Rerum Natura I.155–156). The compact form “ex nihilo nihil fit” is a later scholastic formula. — Parmenides

⚠ Christian theology answered with “creatio ex nihilo” — God creates out of nothing, precisely because God is not bound by the rule. Shakespeare’s Lear throws the maxim at Cordelia — “Nothing will come of nothing: speak again.”

Against any argument that pulls something from nowhere — a free lunch, a cause without a cause, a conclusion without premises.

Explore Next

related by shared connections