Marginalia

Synthetic a priori

synthetische Urteile a priori

Judgments that are informative about the world yet knowable independently of experience. Kant’s master question was how they are possible.

Period 1781Term synthetisch a priori
⇋ Compare ✶ In the Atlas

Kant crossed two distinctions:

A priori (independent of experience)A posteriori (from experience)
Analytic (predicate contained in subject)“All bachelors are unmarried”— (empty)
Synthetic (adds new information)“7 + 5 = 12”, “every event has a cause”“The cat is on the mat”

Hume’s Fork allowed only the top-left and bottom-right boxes. Kant claimed the bottom-left box is full — and that mathematics, geometry, and the foundations of physics live there. Explaining how is the whole project of the Critique of Pure Reason: such judgments are possible because they express the conditions any experience must meet.

The critics

  • Friedrich Nietzsche (Beyond Good and Evil §11): Kant’s answer — “by means of a faculty” — explains nothing, like Molière’s doctor attributing opium’s effect to its “dormitive virtue.” Better to ask why we need such judgments to be believed.
  • Frege argued arithmetic is analytic (reducible to logic), shrinking Kant’s box.
  • Non-Euclidean geometry and relativity showed physical space need not be Euclidean.
  • W. V. O. Quine (“Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, 1951) attacked the analytic/synthetic distinction itself.

Explore Next

related by shared connections