Pūrvapakṣa — no creator
The world has no beginning; karma works by itself; the Veda needs no author. A creator God is neither needed nor coherent.
Siddhānta — Nyāya theism
The world is an effect and needs an intelligent maker; atoms must be joined; karma must be directed; the Veda, being reliable testimony, needs an omniscient author.
The Exchange
who answered whom- UUdayana
Whatever has parts is made, like a pot. The world has parts. So it has a maker — and one who knows the invisible atoms and karma must be omniscient.
- KBKumārila Bhaṭṭa
Who saw the world being made? If God created it, from what, and why? A being without desires has no motive; one with desires is not perfect.
- UUdayana
He creates out of compassion, according to the karma of beings — as a just king rewards and punishes according to desert.
- DDharmakīrti
Then karma does the work and God is idle. And a permanent God cannot be a cause at all — what never changes can produce nothing.
- UUdayana
Unconscious karma cannot steer itself to the right person at the right time, any more than an axe can cut wood without a woodcutter.
- KBKumārila Bhaṭṭa
The Veda is valid precisely because no one wrote it. Give it an author and you give it an author’s possible faults.
Compare the Western debate in Does God Exist?. Udayana’s Handful of Flowers is the Nyāya summit; Kumārila’s Ślokavārttika and Dharmakīrti’s Pramāṇavārttika the sharpest replies.
Explore Next
related by shared connectionsMīmāṃsā
The school of Vedic interpretation — the hermeneutics of ritual and duty that treated the Veda as eternal and authorless, defended the self-validity of knowledge, denied a creator God, and developed theories of language, meaning and law that shaped all of Hindu jurisprudence.
Nyāya
India’s great school of logic and epistemology — the theory of valid knowledge (pramāṇa), the five-membered syllogism, the catalogue of fallacies, realist metaphysics, and the most famous arguments for God in Indian philosophy. Its later form, Navya-Nyāya, became the technical language of all Indian scholarship.
Is There a Self? Nyāya vs. the Buddhists
The thousand-year Indian debate between Nyāya logicians, who argued that memory and recognition prove an enduring self, and Buddhist philosophers, who held that a person is a stream of momentary events.
Gaṅgeśa Upādhyāya
The 14th-century logician of Mithilā who founded Navya-Nyāya, the “New Logic”, in his Tattvacintāmaṇi — a technical language of such precision that it became the common idiom of Indian scholarship for five centuries.
Buddhism
The tradition founded by the Buddha — suffering, impermanence, no-self, and the path to nirvāṇa — later dividing into Theravāda, Mahāyāna (Madhyamaka, Yogācāra) and Vajrayāna.
Dignāga
The founder of Buddhist logic and epistemology — only perception and inference give knowledge, perception grasps bare particulars, concepts are constructions, and words mean by excluding (apoha). He revolutionised the logic of every Indian school.