Marginalia

Sartre vs. Camus

Can revolutionary violence be justified by history?

Period 1951 – 1952
✶ In the Atlas
Jean-Paul Sartre

Commitment to history

Neutrality is complicity. To condemn revolutionary violence while capitalism and colonialism do violence daily is to side with the oppressors.

Albert Camus

Revolt with limits

Rebellion that murders in the name of a future paradise betrays the solidarity from which it was born. No end justifies the camps.

The Exchange

who answered whom
  1. Albert Camus
    Albert Camus

    The Rebel (1951) — from Sade to the Bolsheviks, revolt has become a doctrine of murder. Measure and limit are the law of true rebellion.

  2. Jean-Paul Sartre
    Jean-Paul Sartre

    (Paraphrase) First through Francis Jeanson’s harsh review in Les Temps modernes, then in his own open letter — your mix of dreary self-importance and vulnerability has always kept people from telling you the plain truth; you have stepped out of history.

  3. Albert Camus
    Albert Camus

    (Paraphrase) I will not be lectured on freedom by critics who have never turned anything but their armchairs toward history.

  4. Jean-Paul Sartre
    Jean-Paul Sartre

    After Camus’s death in 1960, a moving eulogy — “his stubborn humanism, narrow and pure, austere and sensual.”

History mostly vindicated Camus on the Soviet Union; Sartre is often credited with seeing colonial violence more clearly — though Camus’s stance on Algeria (“I believe in justice, but I shall defend my mother before justice”) remains bitterly debated.

Explore Next

related by shared connections